Port Arthur ISD Federal Programs

Melvin Getwood
Executive Director for Administration and Support Services
989-6291
mgetwood@paisd.org
Overview
Federal Programs
and Guiding Tenets of
"No Child Left Behind"
Goals and Objectives
lTo give an overview of the history of the federal programs
lTo share main tenets of the No Child Left Behind
lTo explain the purpose and criteria of Title I, Part A
lTo provide information regarding State Compensatory Education
What is the purpose?
obtain a high quality education and reach, at minimum, proficiency on challenging State academic
standards and state academic assessments.
The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, which signed into law on January 8, 2002, is perhaps the most
sweeping reform of federal education legislation since the original Elementary and Secondary
Education Act was passed in 1965. The guiding tenets of NCLB are concentrated on four major areas:
Accountability
In an effort to foster systemic change in the nation’s schools, the NCLB statute
details stringent accountability requirements, as wells as qualification requirements for teachers
and paraprofessionals who provide instruction. NCLB requires that students in all schools be tested
in reading and mathematics beginning in Grade 3, with science assessments added beginning in
2007-2008.
Focus
NCLB puts a special focus on doing what works by stressing the importance of selecting instructional approaches that have a proven track record. To say that an instructional practice or program is research-based, there must be carefully obtained, reliable evidence that the program or practice works. For example, an evaluation might measure a group of children who are learning how to read using different methods, and then compare the results to see which method is most successful.
“Scientifically based research” is defined by the NBLC statute as research that involves the application of rigorous, systematic and objective procedures to obtain reliable and valid knowledge relevant to education activities and programs.
Parent Involvement
Notification and information to parents must be in an understandable and uniform format
and, to the extent practicable, prov1ded in a language that the parents can understand.
At the beginning of each school year, an LEA receiving Title I, Part A funds must notify the
parents of each student attending any Title I, Part A campus that the LEA will provide the
parents on request (and in a timely manner), information regarding the professional
qualifications of the student's classroom teachers, including, at a minimum, the following:
and subject areas in which the teacher provides instruction.
which state qualification or licensing criteria have been waived.
degree held by the teacher, and the field of discipline of the certification or degree.
PARENT NOTIFICATION
A campus that receives Title I, Part A funds must provide to each individual parent:
assessments as required under Title I, Part A; and
consecutive weeks by, a teacher who is not highly qualified.
If a Title I, Part A campus is identified for School Improvement, the LEA must promptly provide the
following information for the parents:
achievement to other elementary schools or secondary schools served by the LEA and the state;
of low achievement;
caused the school to be identified for school improvement; and
supplemental educational services for the child.
REQUIREMENTS FOR WRITTEN POLICIES AND SCHOOL-PARENT COMPACTS
and campus parent involvement policies, as well as school-parent
compacts. A list of specific requirements for the policies and compacts
can be found through the Agency's NCLB web site:
http://www.tea.state.tx.us/nclb
Flexibility
District’s Major NCLB Programs
Title 1, Part A, Improving Basic Programs Operated by LEA’s, School Improvement Program
Title 1, Part B, Reading First
Title 1, Part C, Education of Migratory Children
Title II, Part A, Teacher and Principal Training and Recruiting
Title II, Part D, Enhancing Education Through Technology
Title III, Part A, English Language Acquisition, Language Enhancement and Academic Achievement
Title IV, Part A, Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities
Title V, Part A, Innovative Programs
Title Funding Allocations for PAISD
$4,190,599
$196,633
$ 866,456
$ 42,140
$109,287
$ 62,249
$ 15,917
An LEA that is a Multiple Attendance Area must allocate funds to campuses in rank order on the basis of the total number of low-income students in each attendance area. The LEA is not required to allocate the same per-child amount to a campus with a lower poverty rate than it allocates to campuses with higher poverty rates.
A campus has an enrollment of 800 students, with 730 students considered low income. 9 students have
transferred out and 35 students have transferred in. 800 + 9 – 35 = 774 residing students. 730 low
income students divided by 774 residing students gives the campus a low income percentage of 94.32%.
Program Requirements for Title 1,
Part A Schoolwide Programs
In accordance with the revised (01/08/02) Section 1114(b)(1) of Title I, Part A, a Schoolwide program shall include the following ten federally required components:
1. A comprehensive needs assessment of the entire school that is based on information on the achievement of children in relation to the State academic content standards and student academic achievement standards;
2. Schoolwide reform strategies that—
(A) Provide opportunities for all children to meet the State’s proficient and advanced levels of student performance,
(B) Use effective methods and instructional strategies that are based on scientifically based research that
(1) Strengthen the core academic program in the school,
(2) Increase the amount and quality of learning time, such as providing extended school
year, before- and after-school, and summer school programs and opportunities, and
help provide an enriched and accelerated curriculum, and
(3) Meet the educational needs of historically underserved populations
(C) (1) Address the needs of all children in the school, but particularly the needs of
low-achieving children and those at risk who are members of target populations of any program that is included in the Schoolwide program--
(2) Address how the school will determine if these needs are met, and are designed to implement the State and local improvement plans;
3. Instruction by highly qualified professional staff;
4. High-quality and ongoing professional development for teachers, principals, and paraprofessionals, and if appropriate, pupil services personnel, parents, and other staff to enable all children in the school to meet the State’s student academic standards.
(In accordance with §1119(a)(4) of Title I);
5. Strategies to attract high-quality and highly qualified teacher to high-need schools;
6. Strategies to increase parental involvement;
7. Plans for assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood programs, such as Head Start and Even Start, to local elementary school programs;
8. Measures to include teachers in the decisions regarding the use of assessments described in §1111(b)(3) in order to provide information on, and to improve, the achievement of individual students and the overall instructional program;
9. Activities to ensure that students who experience difficulty mastering any of the State’s standards required by §1111 (b)(1) will be provided with effective, timely, additional assistance. The assistance must include: measures to ensure that students’ difficulties are identified on a timely basis and to provide sufficient information on which to base effective assistance; and
10. Coordination of Federal, State, and local services and programs, including programs such as violence prevention programs, nutrition programs, housing programs, Head Start, adult education, vocational and technical education, and job training.
These ten components must be included in the Campus Improvement Plan
State Compensatory
Education
As a Result
of
SB702
Purpose of SCE
Increase Student Achievement
&
Reduce the Drop-Out Rate
for
Students At-Risk of
Dropping Out of School
Section 29.081
Compensatory
Intensive
and
Accelerated
Instruction
New Requirements
Design and implement appropriate compensatory, intensive, or accelerated instructional services for students at-risk of dropping out of school based on performance data
Effectiveness
The effectiveness of the SCE Program must
be evaluated and documented by school
districts in two ways:
*Reducing the disparity in performance on assessment instructions
*Reducing the disparity rates of high school completion.
State
Criteria for Identification of Students
At Risk of Dropping Out of School
Make certain that students who are identified as at risk have folders that are properly coded, listing the reason(s) why they have been identified as at risk. These folders must be placed and maintained in a secure, yet easily accessible place on campus for viewing.
Also make certain to place students’ folders who have withdrawn in inactive files that contain proper school related documentsUse of Funds
Compensatory Education funds may be used
only to meet the cost of providing:
Funding Restriction
The amount a district may use
to fund disciplinary Alterative
Education Programs (AEP)
is limited to
18%
of the district’s
State Compensatory Education
allotment
Campus Improvement Plan
The district and/or campus improvement plan must include the following:
Law requires the DIP/CIP and
it serves as the
primary record
supporting expenditures
attributed to the
State Compensatory Education
program
Program Intent Codes
24 - Accelerated Education
26 - Nondisciplinary Alternative Education
Programs - AEP Basic Services
27 - Nondisciplinary Alternative Education
Programs - AEP Supplemental SCE costs
28 - Disciplinary Alternative Education
Programs DEAP Supplemental SCE costs
29 - Disciplinary Alternative Education Programs
DEAP Supplemental SCE costs
30 - Title I Schoolwide Activities related to SCE & other costs on Campuses
with 40% or more low-income poverty percentageResources
Internet Sites
United States Department of Education Resources
http://www.tea.state.tx.us/nclb
ESC website resources and staff contacts