p

 

Port Arthur ISD Federal Programs

Melvin Getwood

Executive Director for Administration and Support Services

989-6291

mgetwood@paisd.org

Overview

Federal Programs

and Guiding Tenets of

"No Child Left Behind"

 

Goals and Objectives

lTo give an overview of the history of the federal programs

lTo share main tenets of the No Child Left Behind

lTo explain the purpose and criteria of Title I, Part A

lTo provide information regarding State Compensatory Education

What is the purpose?

The purpose of Title I, Part A is to ensure that all children have fair, equal, and significant opportunities to

obtain a high quality education and reach, at minimum, proficiency on challenging State academic

standards and state academic assessments.


The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001

The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, which signed into law on January 8, 2002, is perhaps the most

sweeping reform of federal education legislation  since the original Elementary and Secondary

Education Act was passed in 1965.  The guiding tenets of NCLB are concentrated on four major areas:

Ø   Accountability for Student Achievement
Ø   Focus on What Works
Ø   Parental Involvement
Ø   Flexibility

Accountability

In an effort to foster systemic change in the nation’s schools, the NCLB statute

details stringent accountability requirements, as wells as qualification requirements for teachers

and paraprofessionals who provide instruction. NCLB requires that students in all schools be tested

in reading and mathematics beginning in Grade 3, with science assessments added beginning in

2007-2008.

 


Focus

   NCLB puts a special focus on doing what works by stressing the importance of selecting instructional approaches that have a proven track record. To say that an instructional practice or program is research-based, there must be carefully obtained, reliable evidence that the program or practice works. For example, an evaluation might measure a group of children who are learning how to read using different methods, and then compare the results to see which method is most successful.

 

     “Scientifically based research” is defined by the NBLC statute as research that involves the application of rigorous, systematic and objective procedures to obtain reliable and valid knowledge relevant to education activities and programs.

 


 Parent Involvement

Notification and information to parents must be in an understandable and uniform format

 

and, to the extent practicable, prov1ded in a language that the parents can understand.

 
PARENTS' RIGHT TO KNOW

 

 At the beginning of each school year, an LEA receiving Title I, Part A funds must notify the

 

 parents of each student attending any Title I, Part A campus that the LEA will provide the

 

 parents on request (and in a timely manner), information regarding the professional

 

 qualifications of the student's classroom teachers, including, at a minimum, the following:

 

ØWhether the teacher has met state qualification and licensing criteria for the grade levels

 and subject areas in which the teacher provides instruction.

 

ØWhether the teacher is teaching under emergency or other provisional status through

 which state qualification or licensing criteria have been waived.

 

ØThe baccalaureate degree major of the teacher and any other graduate certification or

 degree held by the teacher, and the field of discipline of the certification or degree.

 

ØWhether the child is provided services by paraprofessionals and, if so, their qualifications

 

PARENT NOTIFICATION

 

  A campus that receives Title I, Part A funds must provide to each individual parent:

 

ØInformation on the level of achievement of the parent's child in each of the state academic

assessments as required under Title I, Part A; and

 

ØTimely notice that the parent's child has been assigned, or has been taught for four or more

 consecutive weeks by, a teacher who is not highly qualified.

 

 If a Title I, Part A campus is identified for School Improvement, the LEA must promptly provide the

 

 following information for the parents:

 

ØAn explanation of what the identification means and how the school compares in terms of academic

 

achievement to other elementary schools or secondary schools served by the LEA and the state;

 

ØThe reasons for the identification;

 

ØAn explanation of what the school identified for school improvement is doing to address the problem

of low achievement;

 
ØAn explanation of what the LEA or state is doing to help the school address the achievement problem;

 

ØAn explanation of how the parents can become involved in addressing the academic issues that

caused the school to be identified for school improvement; and

 

ØAn explanation of the parents' option to transfer their child to another public school or to obtain

supplemental educational services for the child.

REQUIREMENTS FOR WRITTEN POLICIES AND SCHOOL-PARENT COMPACTS

 

NCLB continues the Title I, Part A requirements for written LEA

 

and campus parent involvement policies, as well as school-parent

 

compacts. A list of specific requirements for the policies and compacts

 

can be found through the Agency's NCLB web site:

 

http://www.tea.state.tx.us/nclb

 

 


 

 

Flexibility

 

 


District’s Major NCLB Programs

 

  Title 1, Part A, Improving Basic Programs Operated by LEA’s, School Improvement Program

    

  Title 1, Part B, Reading First

 

  Title 1, Part C, Education of Migratory Children

 

  Title II, Part A, Teacher and Principal Training and Recruiting

 

  Title II, Part D, Enhancing Education Through Technology

 

  Title III, Part A, English Language Acquisition, Language Enhancement and Academic Achievement

   

  Title IV, Part A, Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities

   

  Title V, Part A, Innovative Programs

 


 

 

Title Funding Allocations for PAISD

 

Title I, Part A

$4,190,599

Title I, Part C

 $196,633

Title II, Part A

$ 866,456

Title II, Part D

$ 42,140

Title III, Part A

$109,287

Title IV, Part A

$ 62,249

Title V

$ 15,917

   An LEA that is a Multiple Attendance Area must allocate funds to campuses in rank order on the basis of the total number of low-income students in each attendance area.  The LEA is not required to allocate the same per-child amount to a campus with a lower poverty rate than it allocates to campuses with higher poverty rates.

      The Title I statue requires allocations to be based on the total number of low-income children in a school attendance area or school.  Therefore, poverty is the only factor on which an LEA may determine funding.
Low income percentage for a campus is determined by dividing the number of low income students by the number of students residing in the attendance area of the campus.  Residing is defined as the campus enrollment plus the number of students who transferred out, minus the number of students who transferred in.

 

Example

 

  A campus has an enrollment of 800 students, with 730 students considered low income. 9 students have

 

  transferred out and 35 students have transferred in.  800 + 9 – 35 = 774 residing students.  730 low

 

  income students divided by 774 residing students gives the campus a low income percentage of 94.32%.

 


 

Program Requirements for Title 1,

 

 

Part A Schoolwide Programs

 

      In accordance with the revised (01/08/02) Section 1114(b)(1) of Title I, Part A, a Schoolwide program shall include the following ten federally required components:

 

  1. A comprehensive needs assessment of the entire school that is based on information on the achievement of children in relation to the State academic content standards and student academic achievement standards;

 

  2. Schoolwide reform strategies that—

 

    (A) Provide opportunities for all children to meet the State’s proficient and advanced levels of student performance,

    (B) Use effective methods and instructional strategies that are based on scientifically based research that

          (1) Strengthen the core academic program in the school,

          (2) Increase the amount and quality of learning time, such as providing extended school 

                year, before- and after-school, and summer school programs and opportunities, and    

                help provide an enriched and accelerated curriculum, and

          (3) Meet the educational needs of historically underserved populations

    (C)  (1)  Address the needs of all children in the school, but particularly the needs of

       low-achieving children and those at risk who are members of target populations of any   program that is included in the Schoolwide program--

§These programs may include counseling and mentoring services, college and career awareness and preparation such as college/career guidance, personal finance education, innovative teaching methods, which include applied learning and team-teaching strategies, and the integration of vocational and technical education programs;

 (2) Address how the school will determine if these needs are met, and are designed to implement the State and local improvement plans;

3. Instruction by highly qualified professional staff;

 

  4. High-quality and ongoing professional development for teachers, principals, and paraprofessionals, and if appropriate, pupil services personnel, parents, and other staff to enable all children in the school to meet the State’s student academic standards.

      (In accordance with §1119(a)(4) of Title I);

 

  5. Strategies to attract high-quality and highly qualified teacher to high-need schools;

 

  6. Strategies to increase parental involvement;

 

  7. Plans for assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood programs, such as Head Start and Even Start, to local elementary school programs;

 

  8. Measures to include teachers in the decisions regarding the use of assessments described in §1111(b)(3) in order to provide information on, and to improve, the achievement of individual students and the overall instructional program;

 

  9. Activities to ensure that students who experience difficulty mastering any of the State’s standards required by §1111 (b)(1) will be provided with effective, timely, additional assistance. The assistance must include: measures to ensure that students’ difficulties are identified on a timely basis and to provide sufficient information on which to base effective assistance; and

 

  10. Coordination of Federal, State, and local services and programs, including programs such as violence prevention programs, nutrition programs, housing programs, Head Start, adult education, vocational and technical education, and job training.

 

These ten components must be included in the Campus Improvement Plan

 


 

State Compensatory

Education

   As a Result

  of

  SB702

Purpose of SCE

Increase Student Achievement

&

Reduce the Drop-Out Rate

for

Students At-Risk of

Dropping Out of School

 

Section 29.081

Compensatory

Intensive

and

Accelerated

Instruction

 

 

New Requirements

 

       Design and implement appropriate compensatory, intensive, or accelerated instructional services for students at-risk of dropping out of school based on performance data

Effectiveness

The effectiveness of the SCE Program must

be evaluated and documented by school

districts in two ways:

*Reducing the disparity in performance on assessment instructions

*Reducing the disparity rates of high school completion.

State Criteria for Identification of Students
At Risk of Dropping Out of School

p9.2.3.1 State Criteria for Identification of Students At Risk of Dropping Out of School

 

pSection 29.081 of the Texas Education code defines the State criteria used to identify students at risk of dropping out of school.
pA student at risk of dropping out of school includes each student who is under 21 years of age and who:
1. Is in pre-kindergarten, kindergarten or grade 1, 2, or 3, and did not perform satisfactorily on a readiness test or assessment instrument administered during the current school year;
2. Is in grade 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, or 12, and did not maintain an average equivalent to 70 on a scale of 100 in two or more subjects in the foundation curriculum during a semester in the preceding or current school year or is not maintaining such an average in two or more subjects in the foundation curriculum in the current semester;
3. Was not advanced from one grade level to the next for one or more school years;
4. Did not perform satisfactorily on an assessment instrument administered to the student under Subchapter B, Chapter 39, and who has not in the previous or current school year subsequently performed on that instrument or another appropriate instrument at a level equal to at least 110 percent of the level of satisfactory performance on that instrument;
5. Is pregnant or is a parent;
6. Has been placed in an alternative education program in accordance with Section 37.006 during the preceding or current school year;
7. Has been expelled in accordance with Section 37.007 during the preceding or current school year.
8. Is currently on parole, probation, deferred prosecution, or other conditional release;
9. Was previously reported through the Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS) to have dropped out of school;
10. Is a student of limited English proficiency, as defined by Section 29.052;
11. Is in the custody or care of the Department of Protective and Regulatory Services or has, during the current school year, been referred to the department by a school official, officer of the juvenile court, or law enforcement official;
12. Is homeless, as defined by the McKinney-Vento Homeless Education Assistance Improvement Act of 2001, Section 725; or
       13. Resided in the preceding school year or resides in the current school year in a residential placement facility in the district, including a     detention facility, substance abuse treatment facility, emergency

         Make certain that students who are identified as at risk have folders that are properly coded, listing the reason(s) why they have been identified as at risk. These folders must be placed and maintained in a secure, yet easily accessible place on campus for viewing.

         Also make certain to place students’ folders who have withdrawn in inactive files that contain proper school related documents

Use of Funds

Compensatory Education funds may be used

only to meet the cost of providing:

va supplemental compensatory, intensive or accelerated instruction program under Section 29.081; or
van alternative education program established under Section 37.008; or
          support to a program eligible under Title I, Part A Program at a campus at with least 40% poverty

Funding Restriction

The amount a district may use

to fund disciplinary Alterative

Education Programs (AEP)

is limited to

18%

of the district’s

State Compensatory Education 

allotment

 


 

Campus Improvement Plan

 

The district and/or campus improvement plan must include the following:

vTotal amount of SCE funds allocated for resources and staff
vComprehensive needs assessment
vIdentified strategies
vSupplemental financial resources for SCE
vSupplemental FTEs for SCE
vMeasurable Performance Objectives
vTimelines for monitoring strategies
vFormative and summative evaluation criteria

Law requires the DIP/CIP and

it serves as the

primary record

supporting expenditures

attributed to the

State Compensatory Education

 program

 


Program Intent Codes

 

24 - Accelerated Education

26 - Nondisciplinary Alternative Education

     Programs - AEP Basic Services

27 - Nondisciplinary Alternative Education

     Programs - AEP Supplemental SCE costs

28 - Disciplinary Alternative Education      

       Programs DEAP Supplemental SCE costs

29 - Disciplinary Alternative Education Programs

     DEAP Supplemental SCE costs

30 - Title I Schoolwide Activities related to SCE & other costs on Campuses  

         with 40% or more low-income poverty percentage

Resources

Internet Sites

United States Department of Education Resources

http://www.tea.state.tx.us/nclb

ESC website resources and staff contacts


PAISD Home Page

PAISD Parent Involvement Page